Hi, I used grade5 or grade4 in this case, depending how bad the whole is. The surface has been inserted far later and seems me redundant and less usable for routing with weighting.
regards Pierre-André kaerast wrote: > Claudius wrote: > >> "Down-grade" them to grade4 or grade5. It's not your job to fix the >> router's routing in the data. >> > > The wiki suggests that the track grades are for surface type rather than > usability. Yet there does also exist surface=* so I'm not sure. The > grades sound like they should be based on how usable or how clear the > track is. > > If setting them to grade5 is going to make people and software think > they aren't very usable then that seems to be the solution, even though > it seems a bit kludgy to me. > _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
