On 16 Jun 2009, at 14:27, Stefan de Konink wrote: > SteveC wrote: >> Wrong again. The ™ was applied for the logo and the name > > So 'mark' means to me 'name' so OpenStreetMap was protected if it > was granted, yes?
If, yes. >> in the UK and Europe and the Foundation owns the whole problem, not >> me. > > I thought you did 'something' in the foundation too ;) Yeah, but now the OSMF is liable, not me. >> Passive aggressiveness works much better when you're also correct :-) > > In your country it seems that companies can apply, and not persons > on their private home addresses ;) > > KT13 9DP != CR5 3QZ Next I'm going to wake up in the morning and you'll be outside my house, stalking me :-O Best Steve _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
