On Tue, 14 Jul 2009 08:49:11 +0100, Tom Hughes <t...@compton.nu> wrote: > Anyway, to draw on Frederik's workshop at SOTM the actual revert is in > many ways the easy part - the hard thing is establishing the authority > to do the revert. In other words the question of who gets to decide that > an edit is "bad" and should be reverted.
A revert is itself just a new changeset. It is not a deletion of an existing changeset. So any user has the rights to do a revert if and only of that user has the right to make an edit. Same semantics as a revert in Wikpedia (as long as a complete revert is technically possible). Marcus _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
