On Tue, 28 Jul 2009 08:25:34 +0200, <marcus.wolsc...@googlemail.com> wrote: > On Tue, 28 Jul 2009 00:22:54 +0200, "Aun Johnsen (via Webmail)" > <skipp...@gimnechiske.org> wrote: >> I do not agree that they bouth should be treated as maxheight=* If my car >> with load that is 3m high, and maxheight=3m, but physical clearance is > much >> higher,than you would pass at the speed limit, but if both maxheight and >> physical clearance is 3m, than I would need to slow down to almost crawl >> when passing the lowest point. maxheight can be 3m even if physical >> clearnance is 3.2m > > > I am not using maxheight in any of the metrics > that involve a travel-time to optimize for so > it has no effect on the route other then allowing > or disallowing that path at all. > Thus at least for me it makes no difference. > > Marcus It makes no difference for your routing software, but maybe I will make a routing software with that option? -- Brgds Aun Johnsen via Webmail
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk