John Smith wrote: > While this isn't my proposal, I have an interest in getting 4wd_only tracks > to render properly. I've slightly modified this page to conform to what > people suggested on the talk-au list. This tag is already in use in the > Australian area, judging by the talk pages possibly other countries too. > > I would like to move things forward and have this render properly, roads that > are 4wd only are everywhere in Australia and they need to clearly state it. > Simply marking things as tracks isn't enough as cars are able to drive along > some tracks, but for clearence reasons they won't be able to drive down a > 4wd_only track. > > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/4WD_Only > > Australian Tagging Guidelines, based on talk-au threads. > > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines#4WD_only_track
High ground clearance required? More 4WD vehicles are appearing nowadays, but it's not always clear what they are actually capable off. So 4WD_Only is not really the correct terminology and does not clearly identify the problem? IS it ground clearance, deep fords, mud or poor traction conditions ... -- Lester Caine - G8HFL ----------------------------- Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/ Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk// Firebird - http://www.firebirdsql.org/index.php _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
