+1 Adding a new value to the highway tag does not seem to fit with the current view of highway-tag usage. This suggestion keeps the "importance" of the roads intact (and thus helps routing software calculate the best route - should a tree-lined road be preferred over a tertiary? Over a unclassified?) And both a residential and tertiary can have trees on the sides.
Konrad 2009/11/4 malenki <o...@malenki.ch>: > > As I explained at talk-de a new tag for $way_with_trees_beside is > suberfluous. Why not to use the existing natural= tag at existing ways > (railways, waterways, highways) like this: > highway=tertiary > surface=asphalt > natural:trees=left(/right/both) > name:botanical=Tilia tomentosa > > Regards > malenki > _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
