On Tue, 1 Dec 2009 13:58:35 +0100, Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com> wrote: > fine, but to me it seems it doesn't care for the viral aspects of our > current license, that is: every derived work (derived from our data) must > have the same license: cc-by-sa 2.0
A website is no derived work of a map presented in it. It is not adding any data to the map or changing the map itself in a significant way. Merely including something is not relevant. Just like Linux-Distributions containing non-free software and lots of unaltered GPL-software. Marcus _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
