On 6 March 2010 16:01, Apollinaris Schoell <ascho...@gmail.com> wrote: >> landuse? no, i didn't use that. i used leisure=park > > sure. ahh… our messy key,tag combinations for areas natural, landuse, > leisure … > >> >> and it's not a national park, only local council >> > > we still use it for parks if it's the type of parks protecting nature and add > a admin_level > similar to political boundary hierarchy > key national_park is also documented that it can be used in a wider range of > parks. >
yeah, i know. precisely why i don't get involved in these discussions/tag admin anymore. everyone's quite happy adding more and more tags to solve their little problem, with no consideration for how it affects the whole. so there are now three methods for tagging parks? good work that man! is it any surprise it's a horrible mess? /out _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
