On 22 March 2010 17:32, Lester Caine <les...@lsces.co.uk> wrote: > There has to be a very good reason for REMOVING any data, and the assertion > that > we can in general 'remove multiple ways' is only acceptable if the project is > also going to adopt the rule 'we will never map detail'? Perhaps it is time > for > a split in the project, and those of us who need to maintain details such as > road structures and property boundaries set up our own fork with tools that > allow things that the simplify everything camp don't thing we should have?
Extending existing tools is also an option, and for the most part, most people only care about real world objects, they tend to care less about abstract things like boundaries, so hiding boundaries for the most people would be a step in the right direction in my opinion... _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
