Frederik Ramm wrote: > Richard Fairhurst wrote: >> maybe JOSM's default display style doesn't visualise relations as >> clearly as Potlatch, I don't know > > May I humbly suggest that, as the lead author of one of OSM's main > editors, you at least look at the competition? I mean I don't demand > that you use it, or understand it - but it would be really good if > any contributor to a major editor would at least have an idea of how > the basic OSM elements look in the other major editors.
I was actually dissembling slightly in an effort to be polite. I know. I could equally have written "this is a clear failing in JOSM which should visualise route relations like Potlatch does. BAN JOSM!! 11!1one". But that would have been gratuitous, a little offensive and contrary to the point of a constructive e-mail. Explaining that has kind of defeated the purpose. Ah well. I do use JOSM occasionally (http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/4160689 ) and will continue to do so, at least while it still supports my system. :) cheers Richard _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk