Ævar
> Agreed, but you personally control the openstreetmap twitter account > don't you? If you think waze's twitter account is nice (what it mostly > does is answer a bunch of user questions, which implies a dedicated > support team sitting behind it). Then perhaps you should give other > people access to that account so they can field user questions under > the of OpenStreetMap banner. Access to the Twitter account, and to posting on OGD, is open. I think your suggestions to answer user questions through our media streams is a good one. > More generally, I agree with your point that we should have more of a > "let's just do it" culture, but it also doesn't help much to have what > are essentially unfinished drive-by improvements like the website > redesign and now the logo which just seem to stir up a lot of dust, > and never go anywhere. I don't mean that it's your fault, just that > there's obviously a lot of disagreement about what we should be doing. > > I we keep having these discussions because don't have any clear > direction for what we want to *do* with OpenStreetMap.org. I think the most effective way to push forward what osm.org could be is by demonstrating ideas with code. Isn't the code base now on github? Start forking, trying out ideas ... things that work are going to be more convincing than our descriptions of what to do. Code that works (in all senses) should make it out to production. These can even be small details. I really really like the additional icons on the browse pages. http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/dankarran/diary/10695 Best Mikel
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk