On 16 June 2010 23:09, Tim McNamara <paperl...@timmcnamara.co.nz> wrote:
> Sorry if I've neglected to look into this issue in more detail. May I ask, > which community consensus are you referring to? OSM or CC? My understanding > was the intention behind a share-alike clause is to compel people using the > work to release their works under similar licences. If the OSM community > doesn't really care about forcing licencing on others, then I actually think > we have reached the same conclusion. See my notes in the last paragraph. > I am interested in our map data, so that we can make great maps, great routing apps, [insert other great things here] So if they improve our _map data_, I want the improvements to be able to be fed back into our map data. Things beyond the map data I am not interested in. / Grant _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
