Olaf,

Thanks, it looks like the clean text has been copied from a source other than 
the diff-marked text. I've deleted it. We are meeting tonight and I'll stop it 
going live until we double-checked the rest of the text too.

Regarding your main concern in 
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/legal-talk/2010-November/005256.html,
Yes the OSMF could produce a new set of Contributor Terms but No it could not 
force you or other existing contributor to accept them. The more existing 
contributors there are, the stronger it gets. We deliberately missed out those 
words that you see on many commercial sites along the lines of "you hereby 
accept these terms and any future update of those terms as published by Acme 
Corp. from time to time." So the 2/3 majority sticks. The constraint for the 
OSMF to ask active contributors also sticks as does the constraint to only use 
a free and open license ... so we believe we've got a very effective 
anti-hijacking system in place.

Mike

At 06:00 PM 18/01/2011, Olaf Schmidt-Wischhöfer wrote:
>Hi Mike,
>
>on December 5, you wrote an email to this list that the words "and any party 
>that receives Your Contents" in section 2 were only added because of a cock-up 
>and you promised to investigate. Now they are in the final text as well, but 
>not marked as such in the diff marked version.
>
>The effect of these additional words is that all content becomes available to 
>everyone without any limitation whatsoever, i.e. it makes all contributions 
>effectively public domain.
>
>Can you confirm that this is the only undocumented change, that it was a 
>mistake, and that it will be corrected before going live?
>
>I would also like to give you feedback on the new CT. They are improved over 
>the old version, but they still do not address my main concern that I 
>described in the second half of an email I sent in November:
>http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/legal-talk/2010-November/005256.html
>
>Olaf


_______________________________________________
legal-talk mailing list
legal-t...@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk

Reply via email to