On 16 April 2011 19:04, Lester Caine <les...@lsces.co.uk> wrote: > John Smith wrote: >> >> On 16 April 2011 17:53, Lester Caine<les...@lsces.co.uk> wrote: >>> >>> The whole database should be public domain, and any third party pushing >>> 'commercial' data into that should understand that. Even the UK >>> government >>> have now accepted that we should have free access to this sort of data, >>> so >>> my own 'need' for OSM has been somewhat diluted since I have an open >>> alternative. I was looking at mirroring my own copy of OSM, but the OS >>> data >>> gives me the facilities I need with less hassle. >> >> Doesn't OS require attribution if you use their data? > > Same as adding a link to OSM where that is the source ...
So your original suggestion that the OS recognises your suggestion about things should be public domain is patently false. _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
