On 24 June 2011 18:10, Ed Loach <e...@loach.me.uk> wrote: > But I had a look at fosm.org yesterday and they (whoever "they" are > - is there a fosmf?) seem to be making the same mistake that osm.org > did with the original CTs; should they ever need to relicense (say > move from cc-by-sa 2.0 to 3.0) the data, then as far as I can tell
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/legalcode Section 4 part b "You may distribute, publicly display, publicly perform, or publicly digitally perform a Derivative Work only under the terms of this License, a later version of this License with the same License Elements as this License" _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
