HI there, I thought FOSM was off topic, where are all the moderators to stop this thread?
I never wanted to leave osm, osm made me leave. I never wanted to fork osm, osm forked itself to some new license. lets keep the facts straight, people just wanted to continue with the same system as before, osm is the one that changed. mike On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 10:18 AM, Emilie Laffray <emilie.laff...@gmail.com> wrote: > That said, the whole point of people in FOSM waiting for OSM to fail is kind > of annoying. I understand why the fork happened (doesn't mean that I agree > with it); I understand why some people are reacting the way they do but I > have to admit it is getting ridiculous. > FOSM is a fork. It is a conscious statement that you wanted to break away. I > am glad that you guys had that *freedom* in the first place (despite all the > FUD that the new contributor terms won't allow forking) and I wish you the > best of luck in this project as I wish the best of luck to other mapping > projects like Common map for example. -- James Michael DuPont Member of Free Libre Open Source Software Kosova http://flossk.org Contributor FOSM, the CC-BY-SA map of the world http://fosm.org Mozilla Rep https://reps.mozilla.org/u/h4ck3rm1k3 _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
