On Wednesday, October 3, 2012, Dave F. wrote: > > > This looks like a great resource & I'm using it regularly but I'm not sure > edits done in Potlatch should automatically be considered "suspicious", and > classifying an edit 'red' because six nodes & one way were removed when > 134/3 were added seems a bit harsh. >
I'm OK with this. Potlatch isn't exactly precise, and it's difficult, even if you know what you're doing, to get what you want out of Potlatch. It's like performing surgery with a baseball bat and chainsaw.
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
