On Sunday 16 February 2014, Pieren wrote: > Someone is mapping the UK floods in OSM (reported on twitter): > > http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/258412163 > > Very bad idea.
Yes, but note the wiki currently does not give any guidelines what degree of permanency is required for a body of water to be mapped as natural=water. There are many other examples of areas which are - if at all - merely sporadically covered with water to the extent they are mapped like: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/23938237 http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/26645398 http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/253952 http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/183083855 http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/71290542 -- Christoph Hormann http://www.imagico.de/ _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
