On 21/11/16 08:36, Rory McCann wrote:
Additionally, there might be nothing there *now*, but there might have been things there in the past, and the name as stuck around, as a locality. Just because a place is unpopulated doesn't mean the place doesn't have a name!
Well, looking at the map, it looks like each and every parcel of land and section of field has a locality tag associated with it. Even allowing for places which don't exist any more and other local/cultural differences, it still seems a bit odd - and begs the question if those tags really need to be there.
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
