Then it wouldn't be hard either to add the names again from a legal source after the redaction.
> El 27 ago 2017, a las 13:04, James <james2...@gmail.com> escribió: > > As Mr.Ramm said, there can be trap streets, which should be removed. > > When I inspected the data, it seems most of it is in Québec and wouldnt be > hard to validate streetnames for 1400 something items. > >> On Aug 27, 2017 11:24 AM, "Paul Norman" <penor...@mac.com> wrote: >>> On 8/27/2017 7:26 AM, john whelan wrote: >>> I would suggest that any street names added by chdr in Canada were more >>> than likely derived from CANVEC sources >> >> What makes you believe this to be so? >> >> _______________________________________________ >> talk mailing list >> talk@openstreetmap.org >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing list > talk@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
