Am 28.08.2017 um 14:43 schrieb Pierre Béland: > Simon Poole wrote > > PS: naturally simply assuming that all name expansions are > legit is a bit iffy, consider Circle vs. Circuit and other > expansions that you often can't decide without external > sources, I don't know if there are any such cases in the > affected data, but it seems to be silly to start wasting time > on something that is essentially a non-problem (revert the > name to the original and re-expand it using current TIGER if > possible). > > To respect contributors participation, I think that it is important to > avoid deleting valid contributions. Naturally. In my experience the DWG goes to great lengths to avoid unnecessary damage, however in cases like we have at hand that requires cooperation from the contributor (identifying legit vs non non-legit contributions), which hasn't been forthcoming. > > Before redaction, what I propose to do for Quebec / Canada : > > I will go through thee chdr list provided by Frederik, and will verify > the history for the name and add either > source:verify tag=chdr name addition without source > confirmationsource:verify tag=chdr name typo correction > > After redaction, it will be easy to select the redacted ways and add > the name from legit source. Maybe I'm misunderstanding what you want to do, but it would seem as if that just amounts to doing the work twice.
Simon > > regard > > Pierre > >
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
