I think the more we can do to automate QA, the better. There should be some common sense guidelines for running bots though: * user names with “bot” in them * user profiles that say what the bot does and where the source code is * common place on GitHub for bot development (osmlab/bots?)
> On Apr 4, 2018, at 4:44 AM, Michał Brzozowski <www.ha...@gmail.com> wrote: > > There's a bot in Poland that comments on changesets which break addresses > (e.g. combining addr:place with addr:street), along with an explanation and > links to forum topic. > > What do you think about it? Are such bots useful or not? > > Michał > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing list > talk@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
