Please see https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/03/17/use-of-cc-by-data/
And really, besides all the other problems with the wiki, deducing anything from the membership of an article in one of the multiple 10'000 essentially random categories is not a good idea. Simon Am 11.01.2019 um 12:01 schrieb Sérgio V.: > Hi, please, just to confirm if yes or no: > The Scientific journal PLOS is told Open Access, as they say: > "REPRODUCTION OF ARTICLES - Articles and **accompanying materials** > published by PLOS on the PLOS Sites, unless otherwise indicated, are > licensed by the respective authors of such articles for use and > distribution by you subject to citation of the original source in > accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license" > (https://www.plos.org/terms-of-use). > According to > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Category:Licenses_compatible_for_OSM_data_imports > CC BY is compatible with OSM requirements. > So, if following those quoted conditions, can we use those > **accompanying materials** (like some SHP of interesting places) to > import to OSM according to their licence? > Thanks for more info. > > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - > > Sérgio - http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/smaprs > > > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing list > talk@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
