From my experience, all this weird things are caused by missing history, so I would guess the export may be fine and current API queries are incomplete thus showing incorrect information sometimes.
Bye po 16. 12. 2019 v 12:33 odesÃlatel Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com> napsal: > > Maybe the following is a result of the history not being available for older > times, in the v6-planet-060403.osm there are objects that seem they shouldn't > be there? E.g. node 393303 according to the current API has its first version > from Aug, 1 2007 (according to JOSM) or 31/07/2007 according to the website > (not sure which of them is showing UTC and which local time, neither are > telling it explicitly, or if it has to do which time is displayed: when the > changeset was created or closed). > Anyway, this node shouldn't be in a dump from 2006 (supposing that the fact > there were redactions e.g. for the license change, would still be visible, > and that ids have not been reassigned even in these old days)? > > There are more nodes like this, e.g. 589954 > https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/589954/history (this one shows that > redactions are accounted for, because you can see that there is a version 1 > and 2 which cannot be shown any more). > > 196651 https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/196651/history > This last one indicates that something weird is going on with the API (maybe > due to missing history) because this is a deletion in version 1 and no > redactions are shown for this object. > > Cheers > Martin _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
