Hi Oleg and all,
On Thu, 21 Sep 2000 12:01:40 +0500GMT (21/09/2000, 15:01 +0800GMT),
Oleg Zalyalov wrote:
G>> I'd like to see an interface that is clean, easy to use,
OZ> I see such an interface right now.
While the meaning of "clean" is not defined (without spaghetti
sauce?), I understand this to be a matter of taste (I find TB's
interface "clean"). Ease-of-use, on the other hand, can be measured. I
think I should make an analysis when I have the time (will cost me a
whole day at least).
On Thu, 21 Sep 2000 07:14:18 +0100GMT (21/09/2000, 14:14 +0800GMT),
Graham wrote:
JA>>>> The seem to be doing a good job of this. Their target users appear
JA>>>> to be Power users who care more about the capabilities of the
JA>>>> program than details in the workings of its interface.
A.>>> Ok, I'll give you that. :-)
G>> Unfortunately....:O(((
That does not mean that the interface can be neglected. It does mean
that functionality will be developed first, but if interface is
developed never, the software product will not persist.
Of those who have complained about the interface though, I think we
are short of constructive arguments, as in: what would you like to see
improved?
One thing is the shortcuts and their various inconsistencies.
Another is the missing documentation and "half" help file.
Glyphs were mentioned; can we see a screen shot from of the people who
are using them? (If these icons are copyrighted, never mind about even
mentioning them again.)
Give me more. :-)
--
Cheers,
Thomas.
Message reply created with The Bat! 1.46d
under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build 1998
on a Pentium II/350 MHz.
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--------------------------------------------------------------
You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
