Hello, > I am thinking that it might be good to change the name of > the Tcl package for Tcl/Java related things to tcljava > instead of java. I like the package name "java". IMHO the interfaces to other systems don't need to contain the string Tcl, since as a Tcl-script writer I know that I'm working with Tcl. (If Tom P. had asked me, OraTcl would be called Oracle, or at least the package command would go "package require oracle") > I think this will make things easier > to explain because we will not have this extra > "The Java package" thing to explain. But there would be "The TclJava package" thing, wouldn't it? > You would have to change "package require java" > to "package require tcljava", but I don't think > that is too big a deal. Right, it would be no big deal, but I can't see the real benefits... Greeting, Krischan -- Christian Krone, SQL Datenbanksysteme GmbH Mail mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ---------------------------------------------------------------- The TclJava mailing list is sponsored by Scriptics Corporation. To subscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word SUBSCRIBE as the subject. To unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word UNSUBSCRIBE as the subject. To send to the list, send email to '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'. An archive is available at http://www.mail-archive.com/tcljava@scriptics.com
