On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 08:59:13AM -0700, Theo de Raadt wrote: > > This is not to point finger at Theo for creating all this commotion, of > > course; > > this commotion can, however, be, an unintended accident, but the fact that > > it came from Theo gave it a lot of credibility. > > Whoa, wait a second here. If you think I gave it credibility, you > need to go back and read my words again. I called it an allegation, > and I stick with that. I was extremely careful with my words, and you > are wrong to interpret them as you do.
Theo, it's hopeless. Kids these days. Can't read, can't code. If you write anything, you can be certain they will take it out of context. They don't understand what a context is. Heck, they will use the excuse that they're "not native speakers" to say they misunderstood. I mean, why should they make the effort ? it's so easier to take a rumor out of context, not verify the source, not verify what it says and run with it. There's NEVER an excuse for mediocrity. I'm not a native speaker, Theo isn't either. That's not a good reason for not understanding/not writing english. That's the same with code, just because you learnt to program with a bad crowd is no excuse for most of the linux and java code out there. ;-)
