On 24 April 2014 22:25, Alexander Hall <alexan...@beard.se> wrote: > On 04/24/14 21:53, Stuart Henderson wrote: >> >> On 2014/04/24 20:30, Mike Belopuhov wrote: >>> >>> On 24 April 2014 20:25, Chris Cappuccio <ch...@nmedia.net> wrote: >>>> >>>> Mike Belopuhov [m...@belopuhov.com] wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> more like it's not supported and is not supposed to work. >>>>> it's like running nginx and apache at the same time >>>> >>>> >>>> hey, nginx and httpd run concurrently quite fine on >>>> different IP addresses, same box :) >>> >>> >>> i meant using the same port numbers of course. >>> >> >> they can do that fine too! :) just have one hand-off the relevant >> requests to the other. >> > > If they bind to separate IP addresses that is obviously not a problem, even > for the same port numbers.
yes. that's precisely what i meant: you can't bind to the same ipaddr:port pair twice. why do i have to chew it and spit it out for you. it was clear what i meant from the start.
