Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2016/01/25 22:52, Michael McConville wrote: > > fddi_bitswap is only used once, and it just adds a layer of > > indirection to its preprocessor condition. > > Oh yuk. This is bogus anyway, and there's no good way to handle it. We > dropped support for FDDI interfaces so it only affect decodes of pcap > files, and who knows where they were created?
I'm not familiar with FDDI and I'm new to tcpdump, so I can't offer much input. How much do you think can/should be removed?
