On Mon, Feb 06, 2017 at 03:54:56PM +0100, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> tb@ found that another code path needs to be unlocked.  Diff below does
> that.  These ioctl(2)s are only messing at the driver level, so it is
> safe to drop the NET_LOCK() there as well.
> 
> ok?

I am happy with this. OK.

And thank you for taking care of this problem!

Reply via email to