> Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2017 07:00:08 +0100
> From: Joerg Sonnenberger <jo...@bec.de>
> 
> On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 09:05:56PM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > Clang only accepts SVM instructions with explicit operands, for
> > example:
> > 
> >   vmload %rax
> 
> You might want to look at the aliases e.g. for monitor/mwait. Should be
> pretty easy to extend as long as we are talkign about pure register
> operands. Memory operands would be more tricky.

To be honest, I think forcing people to use the explicit form as clang
does right now is a good idea.  It makes reading the code much easier.

Reply via email to