Hello,
On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 06:10:54PM +0200, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 03:19:19PM +0200, Alexandr Nedvedicky wrote:
> > I'm attaching updated final patch, which accepts your suggestion.
>
> I think this broke sys/net/pf_forward.
> http://bluhm.genua.de/regress/results/regress.html
> When backing out pf.c rev 1.1024 it works again.
>
> I guess it is a problem with tagged route-to rules in an anchor.
> I cannot investigate right now, but will do later.
>
I have not seen those failures when running pf_forward test. I guess my
test set up is somewhat broken. I'll need your help to get it to shape.
I'll try to follow with on this off-list.
regards
sasha
