On Sun, Jun 25, 2017 at 8:20 PM, Theo de Raadt <dera...@openbsd.org> wrote: > I'd really prefer to see a construct which doesn't do that. But > I don't know if that would result in something really complex.
Sure, will send a different version if the problem that tedu@ mentioned can be solved. Otherwise, probably it's better to keep the current incrementing. >> signed integer, it may overflow, causing undefined behavior > > The development of OpenBSD/univac is running way behind schedule. :-) Speaking of signed integers, does it really need to be signed? -- Dmitry Chestnykh https://www.codingrobots.com
