On Thu, Nov 10, 2022 at 02:56:00PM +0000, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> No point in using the variable for half of the check.
> 
> OK?

OK bluhm@

> diff --git a/sys/netinet6/nd6.c b/sys/netinet6/nd6.c
> index e65eeb0c2ac..d88969be617 100644
> --- a/sys/netinet6/nd6.c
> +++ b/sys/netinet6/nd6.c
> @@ -1025,24 +1025,24 @@ nd6_ioctl(u_long cmd, caddr_t data, struct ifnet *ifp)
>       case SIOCGNBRINFO_IN6:
>       {
>               struct llinfo_nd6 *ln;
>               struct in6_addr nb_addr = nbi->addr; /* make local for safety */
>               time_t expire;
>  
>               NET_LOCK_SHARED();
>               /*
>                * XXX: KAME specific hack for scoped addresses
>                *      XXXX: for other scopes than link-local?
>                */
> -             if (IN6_IS_ADDR_LINKLOCAL(&nbi->addr) ||
> -                 IN6_IS_ADDR_MC_LINKLOCAL(&nbi->addr)) {
> +             if (IN6_IS_ADDR_LINKLOCAL(&nb_addr) ||
> +                 IN6_IS_ADDR_MC_LINKLOCAL(&nb_addr)) {
>                       u_int16_t *idp = (u_int16_t *)&nb_addr.s6_addr[2];
>  
>                       if (*idp == 0)
>                               *idp = htons(ifp->if_index);
>               }
>  
>               rt = nd6_lookup(&nb_addr, 0, ifp, ifp->if_rdomain);
>               if (rt == NULL ||
>                   (ln = (struct llinfo_nd6 *)rt->rt_llinfo) == NULL) {
>                       rtfree(rt);
>                       NET_UNLOCK_SHARED();

Reply via email to