Greg Steuck <gne...@openbsd.org> wrote: > Thanks for the patch. > > I could see some value in tightening the conditions to always check > `!= expected`. I don't see enough improvement from separating the error > case of -1 from the incomplete read case considering the otherwise > identical behavior.
I'll refer to https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-tech&m=169120238326202&w=2 : > What errno is being printed here? So then it becomes a matter of wanting to signal the user that something went wrong other than a short read. Will it be fine to fold into `!= expected` and warning that an incomplete {ELF,program} header was encountered (the warnx)? -Lucas
