On Sat, 2012-09-15 at 10:24 +0300, cornel panceac wrote: > btw, thank you adam for voting against discarding this bug as a > blocker. i'd say that *knowing* that an operating system will destroy > existing data on certain conditions and still declaring it Alpha GOLD, > it's far from reasonable expectations. my understanding is that, when > we say that an OS *may* destroy data is like saying that "We have not > seen this ever but, since it's alpha it still may happen." > > but maybe it's just me that is disconnected from reality :)
That's pretty much how I see it, but I lost that vote... -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
