@ Steve Rooke -- Warren and I have had correspondence in the past about other things, and I was very interested in his TPLL implementation. Someone in the thread had asked Warren if he would supply a schematic diagram of his particular set-up. I never saw an answer to that, so I asked too. Warren essentially refused, indicating that everything I whould need, if I was competent to understand it, was already posted or available and that if that wasn't enough, I probably shouldn't be messing with it.
After several rounds of me asking and Warren being dismissive, I gave up. I'm not sure if Warren thinks there is something commercially valuable here and is protecting his baby, or what, but his flat refusal to provide a detailed view of his experimental set-up is hard to understand. I asked in good faith and got nowhere. So, I'm just a bystander. If you understand his experimental set-up, or if you have a working version of your own, it would help me a lot if you could provide more details about parts and pieces. Best, Dick Moore On Jun 23, 2010, at 5:00 AM, time-nuts-requ...@febo.com wrote: > Message: 1 > Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2010 19:17:43 +1200 > From: Steve Rooke <sar10...@gmail.com> > Subject: Re: [time-nuts] crystal oscillators & TPLL > To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement > <time-nuts@febo.com> > Message-ID: > <aanlktinden2nasybfxjczqhqht9ypqu6dbu7ialsj...@mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > Bob, > > On 23 June 2010 15:13, Robert Benward <rbenw...@verizon.net> wrote: >> Steve, >> It is admirable that you stick up for Warren. ?Part of Warren's problem is > > Now, let's please get this straight, I have been trying to act as a > facilitator in all of this because I believe that I know what the ral > problem is here and perhaps we will touch upon that a bit later. _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
