> I'm not clear how accurately one can resolve the phase transition > in the new scheme, but I suspect probably unambiguously to 1 cycle of > the 60 KHz... and from there is merely a function of how accurately one > can resolve the phase of the 60 KHz. This potentially can supply a > much higher resolution time hack than the AM envelope.
I think the low transmitting-antenna bandwidth will prevent an unambiguous identification of the exact cycle of phase inversion, just as it smears out the AM transition from high power to low power. Fitting a model to the signal's AM exponential decay (or PM transition) would be better than a simple threshold, but at best it might get down to 50 us territory (excluding the propagation delay and iono uncertainties). Cheers, Peter _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
