Hello Nigel,

Finally I got enough courage and removed the OCXO, you know what kind of task it is.. Fortunately I didn't spoiled the PCB so I'll install 2 smb connectors in the provided places, I don't want to return there if I need to change the oscillator. Well, the oscillator is ok, this is in some way bad news because the oscillator is easily replaceable, and the EFC voltage remains stuck on 5.02 V. Now I'll test the quad op-amp and the related parts. If they are ok the problem is in the Xilinx chip, something that cannot be replaced unless I get parts donor, even that way is very problematic since it is a 80 pin chip. I'll continue posting my findings.

Best regards,
Ignacio


El 13/11/2014 a las 12:03, GandalfG8--- via time-nuts escribió:
Hi Ignacio
I'm sure removing the oscillator would make your faultfinding much more
straightforward.
When I removed mine I started out quite convinced I wouldn't be able to do
it, even with the solder mostly removed from around the pins they were
obviously  quite a tight fit and all I had available at that time was a plunger
type  solder sucker and desoldering braid, as the bits on my old Pace
desoldering kit  were well past their best.
The answer basically was lots of braid, lots of patience, and resisting
like crazy any temptation to pull against a hole that wasn't fully released,
but  I certainly wouldn't want to do it that way again in a hurry.
The desoldering gun I use now would make it easier but the holes are really
  a bit small for those oscillator pins.
The good news though is that the connectors are there as a back up and
fitting them definitely makes it more versatile.
I had considered repeating the performance on another NTGS50AA  and/or
NTBW50AA, I really think I should but so far haven't found the  courage:-)
I think previous checks for 1PPS outputs might have been limited to the
external connectors but it would make sense if it was available somewhere on
the  PCB, I'll try to get one powered up later and check your findings, if I
can find  a bit of space that us amongst the usual chaos!
Regards Nigel
GM8PZR
In a message dated 13/11/2014 01:11:30 GMT Standard Time,
eb4...@cembreros.jazztel.es writes:

Hi  Nigel,

Thank you for the suggestions, I was trying to avoid the OCXO  removal but
I think that now it must be done.
I was also playing with the  idea of populating the connectors so an OCXO
exchange could be easily made,  this makes possible to try various
oscillators.
Meanwhile I has been  probing and measuring a lot of points and by chance I
found a very interesting  thing:  Probing TP33 (which is close to the
Trimble chip (U2) and  directly connected to pin 76) there is a 1PPS, 10 us wide
signal.  I've  checked it and appears to be synchronous with the 1/2 PPS
output so maybe it  can be routed to an output, probably I'll replace the 1/2
PPS with it, using  the existing drive circuit and connector since it is very
  straightforward.
My only concern is if this signal only is there during the  anomalous
condition that I have now, I have to retest it after fixing it.
I  had asked several times if anybody had located a 1PPS signal on these
units,  but the responses were negative and I had not probed systematically
the board  before.  Also I'm taking notes of the signals found and I'll try to
make  a partial schematic at least with the EFC circuitry.  When I fix it
I'll  clean the notes and figures and I'll upload it to some place.


Best  regards,
Ignacio

El 12/11/2014 a las 11:47, GandalfG8--- via  time-nuts escribió:

Hi Ignacio

I have removed a "faulty" oscillator from one of these, not one  of my more

relaxed moments and quite amazed when the board emerged totally  undamaged,

but proof at least that it can be done:-)

With the oscillator removed there's access to two sets of connector  pads

that will either accept SMA or SMB connectors and after  conducting tests
on

the original oscillator via flying leads just  soldered to the board I

decided not to fit a replacement to the board after  all but to fit a
couple of

SMB connectors to make the setup more versatile, and  to avoid the

possibility of having to remove another oscillator in the  future:-)

Another advantage of these pads is that if the board does get damaged

removing the oscillator they can still be used as an alternative.

The connectors take the 10MHz from the oscillator into the board and  the

EFC control voltage out from the board to the oscillator, now there's a

surprise:-), and oscillator power can be completely external if required.

>From this it would seem that the reference supply from the  oscillator

itself is not used in practice, certainly not in the "offboard" case
anyway.

As others have suggested it seems likely your problem may not be the

oscillator itself, but it still might be worth removing anyway to make
testing

and fault finding more straightforward.

The maximum positive excursion of the NTGS50AA should be 6 volts, not 5 as

you're seeing, and another indication it might be worth removing the

oscillator  to see how the board behaves stand alone.

I've not seen what seemed to be the repeated attempts at lock that you

mentioned previously, but then I wasn't even aware for a long time that the
control voltage could drive below 3 volts as well as above it:-)

This is my note from previous observation of my "faulty"  unit----

-------------------------------------------------------------

When first powered it brings up all LEDs and then switches to a green LED

for a few seconds and then amber. It starts a self survey and acquisition

process with all appearing ok, and the DAC voltage reported as 3.000002

volts.

Sometime later, I've seen as short as 6 minutes but as long as 12 to  15

depending on how long the oscillator has been turned off and allowed to
cool,

once enough satellites are being tracked, the DAC voltage starts to

increase,  presumably seeking to drive the oscillator frequency to 10MHz,
but the

frequency  doesn't reach 10MHz and the DAC voltage ramps up to 6.000004
volts

over a period  of approx 30 seconds where it remains.

As the DAC voltage crosses approx 5.6  volts the Red "fault" LED is

switched on, as opposed to green that would  normally be expected to
indicate all

was well, and Lady Heather's "OSC:" report  switches from Good to Bad and

highlights red. Similarly "Normal OSC age" changes  to "OSC age alarm" and
also

highlights red.

---------------------------------------------------------------

I've attached a Lady H plot that shows this, hopefully it will get through

OK.

The above DAC voltages were as reported by Lady Heather but I've checked

these and, when the board is working as it should be anyway,  they're very

close.

In my case the problem described above was an oscillator that had  aged

beyond the upper 6 volt limit, needing approx 6.54 volts to reach  10MHz,
and

once removed from the board I was able to add a simple op  amp level
shifter

to bring it back into range just to prove all else was ok,  which it was,

but obviously Lady H now indicated the EFC into the level  shifter rather
than

at the oscillator itself.

Whilst your problem sounds like it might not be quite such an obvious  fix,

removing the oscillator would open the loop and make  testing both the

oscillator and the board much easier, so much as it's  a pain I do feel
that's

probably your best next step.

Regards

Nigel

GM8PZR

In a message dated 12/11/2014 02:06:54 GMT Standard Time,

_eb4apl@cembreros.jazztel.es_ (mailto:eb4...@cembreros.jazztel.es)  writes:



Hi,



Removing the oscillator for testing and replacing it  with other if it

was the culprit was my first option.  I have a spare  Trimble oscillator

that probably came from other NTGS50AA since it still  have the foam band

attached, but this oscillator is really aged, it needs  7.91 V to bring

it on spot and the maximum control voltage of the NTGS50AA  is 5 V.

I was trying to avoid removing the oscillator but probably it must  be

done to clarify things.



Thank you,

Ignacio  EB4APL



.

El 12/11/2014 a las 2:40, Mark Sims escribió:


I  have seen this caused by the oscillator not responding to the EFC


signal.  Fixed it by swapping in a MV-89 oscillator.


The  oscillators used in these units don't output an oven temperature


monitor  signal.


_______________________________________________

  time-nuts mailing list -- _time-nuts@febo.com_ (mailto:time-nuts@febo.com)

To unsubscribe, go to


https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts


and follow the  instructions  there.




_______________________________________________

time-nuts  mailing list -- _time-nuts@febo.com_ (mailto:time-nuts@febo.com)

To unsubscribe, go to

https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts

and follow the  instructions there.



_______________________________________________

time-nuts mailing list -- _time-nuts@febo.com_ (mailto:time-nuts@febo.com)

To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts

and follow the instructions there.



_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Reply via email to