On Wed, 2010-12-22 at 19:50 +0100, grischka wrote: > Henry Kroll wrote: > > I noticed today that default install paths were messed up. Sorry about > > that. This puts things back to normal. > > > > http://repo.or.cz/w/tinycc.git/commitdiff/f449f98dec922a0915759584fe53bcbc63f8c1a4 > > > > ./configure > > Binary directory /usr/local/bin > > TinyCC directory /usr/local/lib/tcc > > Library directory /usr/local/lib > > Include directory /usr/local/include > > Manual directory /usr/local/man > > Info directory /usr/local/info > > Doc directory /usr/local/doc/tcc > > > > Also adds option --sharedir for some distros (Fedora) who have their > > documentation root in /usr/share or /usr/local/share. When not specified > > it defaults to the above. > > Should not docdir be /usr/local/share/doc/tcc as before? > > > > > ./configure --sharedir=/usr/local/share > > Binary directory /usr/local/bin > > TinyCC directory /usr/local/lib/tcc > > Library directory /usr/local/lib > > Include directory /usr/local/include > > Manual directory /usr/local/share/man > > Info directory /usr/local/share/info > > Doc directory /usr/local/share/doc/tcc > > > > _______________________________________________ > Tinycc-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel Hmmm, some distros have /usr/local/doc as well as I believe Mac OSX? I don't know, how many mac users are out there? I thought the older ones had it in /usr/local/doc, but I did think about putting everything under /share by default like the latter version. Should we do that? It's like a one line change now.
_______________________________________________ Tinycc-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
