uso ewin wrote:
Hello, Sorry if I take time to answer, So actually it's not a test issue, because gcc can do difference between a 'char *' a 'signed char *', and a 'unsigned char *', gcc doesn't consider int and a typedef of an int as the same type, and most important it will find the good match to a long. grischka seems to have fix char * problem, I've just push a fix for the long on my github, but it does refactor how VT_LONG is handle so I’m not very confident on pushing it now on mob without a review (this is why it take me time to answer). I've also fix all type. for the typedef, I guess it might work, but I didn't check further yet.
Does it work with "_Generic(i + 1L, ...)" ? -- gr _______________________________________________ Tinycc-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
