+1. This term "toy compiler" is an offensive term. It belittles people who write small compilers whichare objectively superior to big compilers.
If 2 lines of code gets the same result as 200lines of code, the latter isn't that of an expert but of an oversmart fool! tcc is amazing and I agree that it's aim should be to support latest C standards, that are minimal and required. I agree with going to C11. Thanking you Sagar Acharya https://humaaraartha.in/selfdost/selfdost.html 13 Sept 2023, 15:36 by cont...@strahinja.org: > On 23/09/12 07:20PM, Detlef Riekenberg wrote: > >> * everywhere is mentioned, that tcc aims for c99 compatibility >> - with the move of manny programs to use multithreading >> and other modern C11 features, i suggest, >> that the goal for tcc should be updated to C11 compatibility. >> > > I support this only after full C99 compatibility is achieved, because > suckless > software uses it exclusively. I would very much like to have a simple C > compiler fully supporting C99. > _______________________________________________ Tinycc-devel mailing list Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
