> On Thu, 28 Feb 2002, Remy Maucherat wrote: > > > The request is slightly different at the moment, but that's because I don't > > know what I need (so sorry, I'm not using your BaseRequest for the first > > version). The Catalina adapter will be a full reimplementation of the > > o.a.c.connector package (which has issues), and will use facaded > > request/response objects. > > So I'm doing the optimization work for you here. > > Thanks :-) > > The Catalina adapter in jk is refactored and optimized a bit in jk2,
Yes, I saw it. It's indeed better already. > but I would be very happy to not have to spend time on this and I'm > sure you'll do a much better implementation for 4.0 :-) I'm not sure it will be that much better. I'll try to do some lazy evaluations for everything. > It would be nice to avoid too many layers/adapters, but for start > it would be resonably easy to implement a JkHandler that delegates > to your Request. "My" request may evolve to be your request in the next version, so maybe not much work at all will be needed. We'll see about that soon (hopefully). > For now this is not a major issue, the current code seems ok, but > in time it would be good to not duplicate the work, it's not > that much fun to optimize the same thing too many times :-) Yes. Remy -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
