On Tue, 30 Apr 2002, Bernd Koecke wrote: > some weeks ago I send a patch for mod_jk for an only routing lb_worker. A few > days later I sent the docu. Henry Gomez said, that it should be commited. But it > I think it isn't in the repository. But its the same with me here, to mutch > work for to less time :).
I think it is in mod_jk, I remember seeing the commit. And I think I commited it in jk2 as well ( after some modifications ). > I need sticky sessions but no loadbalancing in the module. If a request without > a session comes in, it should be routed to the _local_ tomcat. Well, there is another use-case with the exact same behavior - Apache2 with tomcat in JNI mode. All requests without session should be routed to the _jni_ channel ( i.e. in-process, minimal overhead ). It's exacly the same - so be sure I do my best to handle this case :-) Apache2 acts like a 'natural' load-balancer/fail-over, with the parent process monitoring for crashes and it starts/stop childs based on load. > I think this could be possible with the associated instance of a channel (item > 7). Then I have to configure all four nodes for the same group. Because all > nodes will serve the same webapps and associate the channel with this group. But > for this I need a non balancing group. I don't see if the default behavior of a > group is balancing and if this can be switched off. Is this right or do I miss > something? The default is balancing, but you can tune this using weithgs ( and I think we use your code for making one instance 'top priority'). Please check the code, take a look and send additional comments/patches. It's not yet completely done, of course. Thanks, Costin -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
