"Remy Maucherat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Larry Isaacs wrote: > > > Hi Remy, > > > > Okay, re-reviewed the original 22666 thread. To complete this thread, > > I'll assume the following from RFC2718 is our justification for the > > new behavior: > > > > Unless there is some compelling reason for a > > particular scheme to do otherwise, translating character > > sequences into UTF-8 (RFC 2279) [3] and then subsequently > > using the %HH encoding for unsafe octets is recommended. > > > > Tomcat will default to US-ASCII instead of UTF-8 so it won't break > > too many existing webapps. If there are other parts to this story, > > I would be interested in learning of them. > > > > I'm still concerned that this makes Tomcat less useful by creating > > deployment problems for webapps that aren't technically broken. > > However, these issues were covered in the prior e-mail thread > > (http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg46479.html), > > so I'll drop the issue. Thanks. > > The idea for the change is that there's no compelling reason (except > hacking) to have one part of the URI be in some encoding (US-ASCII or > UTF-8, if you want to have any chance of mapping it successfully), and > the rest encoded in something else. > > There's indeed a bug thread on this issue, and I was on your side at first. > +1 (For Remy)
> Rémy --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
