Hi Henri,
just tested that it breaks compilation on Win32 platform to -- my patch solved it.

Guenter.

>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

>>> hgomez      2004/03/01 05:47:23
>>>
>>>   Modified:    jk/native/common jk_ajp_common.c
>>>   Log:
>>>   More debug/trace infos on remote tomcats

>> I added more infos on IP/PORT of remote tomcats in jk, since I've some
>> reports that there is a problem for admins to determine which tomcat
>> is down when they have many workers defined...

>> I overcome the inet_ntoa by using a jk_dump_hinfo function which should
>> works also in multi-threaded env.

>> It should works on Unixes, but I'd like to have reports from
>> Win32, Netware and others exotics OS users...
> the change of
> --- jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native/common/jk_connect.c 2004/02/24
> 08:45:48 1.17
> +++ jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native/common/jk_connect.c 2004/03/01
> 13:37:38 1.18

> breaks all targets on NetWare: netscape, apache-1.3 and apache-2;
> the problem is that in_addr_t and in_port_t are not defined.
> Futhermore I consider in_addr_t as a dangerous var, google a bit and you
> will see that some OSes define it as unsigned long (which is what we need
> here) while others define it to a struct in_addr. NetWare also defines it
> to the in_addr struct so that its useless here - and even more ugly it
> would be if I had to include netinet/in.h for other reasons, then I would
> have to undef at least in_addr_t.
> So we should avoid these typedefs at all, and simply use ulong and ushort.

> --- jk_connect.c.origMon Mar 15 16:04:08 2004
> +++ jk_connect.c      Mon Mar 15 18:16:28 2004
> @@ -288,8 +288,8 @@
>   */
>  char * jk_dump_hinfo(struct sockaddr_in *saddr, char * buf)
>  {
> -in_addr_t laddr = htonl(saddr->sin_addr.s_addr);
> -in_port_t lport = htons(saddr->sin_port);
> +unsigned long laddr = htonl(saddr->sin_addr.s_addr);
> +unsigned short lport = htons(saddr->sin_port);

>  sprintf(buf, "%d.%d.%d.%d:%d",
>          (int)(laddr >> 24), (int)((laddr >> 16) & 0xff), (int)((laddr >>
>          8) & 0xff), (int)(laddr & 0xff), (int)lport);

> I've not tested this yet, but at least I can now compile again. In addtion
> our older clib has a strange behavior with these functions, so there's
> certainly another additional patch needed for apache-1.3 and netscape;
> apache-2 should work with the above.

> btw: we should really take care of tabs and avoid them - as outlined in
> the ASF developer docs. Currently there are a couple of files which
> contain tabs, they should be removed IMO.

> Guenter.



> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to