really, so then there is no fail over. cause that is what fail over does, redirects you to another server. and with session replication in place, you should be good to go
FIlip ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mladen Turk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'Tomcat Developers List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2004 2:00 PM Subject: RE: Simple Sticky LB WAS: Invitation to HTTPD commiters in tomcat-dev Filip Hanik wrote: > > >I suppose in this case the load balancer would run HOOK_MIDDLE, and > >sticky would run HOOK_LAST. > > cool, and then have the server just try them in that order? > ie, if the sticky server went down, it just takes the next > one from the list (and that list should be ordered well since > it comes from the LB algorithm) > > correct assumption? > Think that it should return 'Server Busy' in case the sticky is not available, cause you may be in the middle of transaction while the other server might have no clue about that. MT. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
