At 04:43 AM 2/19/2005, Remy Maucherat wrote: >William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: >>It definately seems like j-t-c should be a first candidate >>for svn conversion. The other jakarta-tomcat repositories >>are considerabily more complex. >>But it would be good to have line endings straightened out >>beforehand. > >I find svn quite confusing to work with. Especially, the possibility of >browsing a revision tree seems unusable (due to the fact that revisions are >global, tortoise cannot make a graph in less than 4 hours :( ), and it's an >important tool for me. > >Unfortunately, this means I'll have to veto a move to svn for the time being, >until I figure out how to use it.
Sadly, I agree with you - my biggest hiccup is the mess that moving from cvs->svn creates if you want to see annotated source files - knowing a line changed in 1.99.3.1 is hugely important to me. Bill --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
