DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34396>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34396 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|minor |trivial Priority|P3 |P5 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-25 11:13 ------- OK. My application in not important. Other J2EE application servers usually throws SecurityException for directory access from asynch Threads started into init() or service() method call. Threre is no difference between <servlet>.init() and <servlet>.service(...) permission. I don't see difference in J2EE specification for <servlet>.service(...) and <servlet>.init() permission. @see http://java.sun.com/j2ee/j2ee-1_4-fr-spec.pdf Page 87: J2EE.6.2 Java 2 Platform, Standard Edition (J2SE) Requirements It's a trivial problem. Thanks for your effort into developing Tomcat. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
