Thanks for the reply, Dennis. I did some reading in the list archives on the subject, and we decided to go with mod_jk.
"Dennis Payne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > It looks like things regarding a connector are still in flux... probably > not time to panic yet. JK2 works. mod_jk works. Choose one. > >>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 12-22-2004 17:03 >>> > On November 15th, there was an announcement that JK2 is officially > unsupported. > > http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-4.1-doc/jk2/news/20041100.html#20041115.1 > > > We're in the process of configuring new servers and integrating Apache > with > Tomcat. We are migrating applications from servers running Apache w/ > mod_jk > against Tomcat 4 w/ JK (not JK2). > > I had been under the impression that JK2 was superior to JK. In light > of > the announcement, should we be sticking with JK from here-on-in? > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
